The most egregious media bias is found in what stories they decide to cover

You probably haven't seen much coverage about the fact that we messed up in Libya by working to eliminate Kadafi. Hillary Clinton was on the forefront of this as Secretary of State, and took credit for what was accomplished before it became obvious that the results were disastrous. Here's what the British House of Commons had to say:

 "This policy," the conservative-led committee concluded, "was not informed by accurate intelligence. In particular, the [British] Government failed to identify that the threat to civilians was overstated and that the rebels included a significant Islamist element. By the summer of 2011, the limited intervention to protect civilians had drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change. That policy was not underpinned by a strategy to support and shape post-(Gadhafi) Libya. The result was political and economic collapse, inter-militia and inter-tribal warfare, humanitarian and migrant crises, widespread human rights violations, the spread of (Gadhafi) regime weapons across the region and the growth of ISIL in North Africa."

So what does the media cover? A gaffe by the Libertarian candidate  Apparently the media have figured out that a vote for Johnson is a lost vote for Hillary